Which of the following is not the merit while filling vacancies in higher jobs from within the organization?
Which of the following is not the merit while filling vacancies in higher jobs from within the organization?
Solution
Option 1 -> Filling jobs internally is cheaper as compared to getting candidates from external sources.
This IS a merit - internal recruitment saves costs on advertising, recruitment agencies, and extensive selection processes.
Option 2 -> Employees are motivated as a promotion at a higher level may lead to a chain of promotions at lower levels in the organization.
This IS a merit - internal promotions boost employee morale and motivation by demonstrating career growth opportunities.
Option 3 -> This is a more reliable way of recruitment since the candidates are already known to the organization.
This IS a merit - the organization already has knowledge of the employee's performance, skills, and cultural fit, reducing hiring risks.
Option 4 -> It is a time consuming process to recruit people from within the organization.
This is NOT a merit - this statement describes a disadvantage. Moreover, it's factually incorrect as internal recruitment is typically faster than external recruitment.
Hence, Option 4 -> Internal recruitment is actually faster and less time-consuming compared to external recruitment. This option describes a disadvantage rather than a merit, making it the correct answer to what is NOT a merit of internal recruitment -> correct
Related questions:
2025: 21 May Shift 1
2025: 3 June Shift 1