A parcel's shipping cost is proportional to the square of its volume in cubic meters. Suppose we break the parcel into 3 packages in the ratio of its original volume, to qualify for lower shipping cost. If the savings are the equivalent of cubic meters, what was the original volume of the parcel?
A parcel's shipping cost is proportional to the square of its volume in cubic meters. Suppose we break the parcel into 3 packages in the ratio of its original volume, to qualify for lower shipping cost. If the savings are the equivalent of cubic meters, what was the original volume of the parcel?
Solution
Let the original volume be cubic meters.
Since shipping cost is proportional to the square of volume:
Original shipping cost (where is a constant)
The parcel is broken into 3 packages with volumes in ratio .
Total ratio parts
Package volumes:
- Package 1:
- Package 2:
- Package 3:
New shipping costs:
- Package 1 cost:
- Package 2 cost:
- Package 3 cost:
Total new cost
Converting to common denominator of 100:
, ,
Total new cost
Savings
The savings are equivalent to cubic meters of shipping cost:
Savings
The original volume was cubic meters.
The original response sheet shows this:
The question seems broken. The savings figure does not give a proper answer.
The answer key says 10, which works only if savings (i.e. ), meaning the question likely intended to write 62 or , not .
However, option 4 was awarded marks.
Related questions:
BMSAT Kozhikode 2025