Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Let R={(L1,L2):L1⊥L2 R = \{(L_1, L_2): L_1 \perp L_2\ where L1,L2∈LL_1, L_2 \in L (set of straight line in a plane)}, then

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 2

The relation R={(L1,L2):L1⊥L2}R = \{(L_1, L_2): L_1 \perp L_2\} where L1,L2∈LL_1, L_2 \in L (set of straight lines in a plane) needs to be checked for reflexive, symmetric, and transitive properties.


Checking if RR is reflexive:

A line cannot be perpendicular to itself. For two lines to be perpendicular, they must intersect at 90°, but a line and itself overlap completely.

Therefore (L,L)∉R(L, L) \notin R for any line LL.

RR is not reflexive.


Checking if RR is symmetric:

If line L1L_1 is perpendicular to line L2L_2, then L2L_2 is also perpendicular to L1L_1. The angle between them is 90° regardless of which line is considered first.

If (L1,L2)∈R(L_1, L_2) \in R, then (L2,L1)∈R(L_2, L_1) \in R.

RR is symmetric.


Checking if RR is transitive:

Consider:

  • L2L_2 is a vertical line
  • L1L_1 is a horizontal line, so L1⊥L2L_1 \perp L_2
  • L3L_3 is another horizontal line, so L2⊥L3L_2 \perp L_3

However, L1L_1 and L3L_3 are both horizontal lines, making them parallel, not perpendicular.

Therefore, L1⊥L2L_1 \perp L_2 and L2⊥L3L_2 \perp L_3 does not imply L1⊥L3L_1 \perp L_3.

RR is not transitive.


The relation RR is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question