A sportsperson could be an expert in badminton and / or squash. Given that someone is a squash expert, the probability that they are expert at badminton as well is 0.8. There are twice as many badminton experts as there are squash experts. Given that Saina is a badminton expert, what is the likelihood that she is an expert in squash?
A sportsperson could be an expert in badminton and / or squash. Given that someone is a squash expert, the probability that they are expert at badminton as well is 0.8. There are twice as many badminton experts as there are squash experts. Given that Saina is a badminton expert, what is the likelihood that she is an expert in squash?
Solution
Let's use B for badminton expert and S for squash expert.
What we know:
| Information | Mathematical form |
|---|---|
| If someone is a squash expert, probability they're also a badminton expert is 0.8 | |
| There are twice as many badminton experts as squash experts |
What we need to find:
Given Saina is a badminton expert, what's the probability she's also a squash expert? This is .
We'll use Bayes' Theorem, which connects these probabilities:
This formula helps us "flip" a conditional probability. We know but need .
Substituting what we know:
The cancels out from numerator and denominator:
Why does this make sense?
Among squash experts, 80% also play badminton (high overlap). But there are twice as many badminton experts overall, meaning many badminton experts don't play squash. So the reverse probability is lower: only 40% of badminton experts also play squash.
Answer: 0.4