why is this wrong

1: Its a parajumble. Expect this lmao. Treat it like poker -> You can get good at it, but in the end a MASSIVE amount of luck is still there. But over a long period of attempts, it should average out to be in profit.

2: General rule of thumb is to go Broad -> Specific, No opinion -> Opinion (as in "subject introduced, subject is bad cuz xyz, subject is good cuz abc etc)

2.5: Unlike the advice we all get for good writing/essays, parajumbles GENERALLY start as milquetoast and boring/neutral as possible. If a sentence seems like a good "hook" for a larger piece of writing, it is likely to be a trap.

3: In this case, 3 introduces the topic. 2 CAN introduce, but it is a piece of evidence for 3.

4: It is pretty likely that 4 is conclusion, cause you don't really end on an opinion (as in music = good (2), or music could be good or bad (1))

This means rn you have 3 _ _ 4. tbh here now its a 50/50. But the payoff is +4-1, so that should be an EV of +1.5. Told you, just like Poker.

(Ps, if it makes it any better, I would have done 3124)