Confusion in Question Of Statement and Conclusions

The statement says:

“The use of non-conventional sources of energy will eliminate the energy crisis in the world.”

This means:

• There is an energy crisis.
• Conventional energy sources are not enough.
• Non-conventional energy sources (solar, wind, etc.) can help solve the problem.
• Conclusion I:“Modern technology is gradually replacing the conventional sources of energy.”If non-conventional sources are being used to solve the energy crisis, it suggests that people are moving away from conventional sources and adopting newer alternatives. So this conclusion logically follows.
• Conclusion II:“The excessive exploitation of environment has led to depletion of conventional sources of energy.”Why do we even need non-conventional energy? Because conventional sources are getting depleted/exhausted due to overuse. This idea is implied in the statement. So Conclusion II also follows.

“Modern technology is gradually replacing the conventional sources of energy.”

“The excessive exploitation of environment has led to depletion of conventional sources of energy.”