why is my approach wrong?

2

Please log in to comment and participate in discussions.

Comments (6)

The mistake is in how you’re picking extreme values.

From n − m = −10, you correctly get n = m − 10, so

3m + 2n = 5m − 20

Now the key point is that m² < 225 gives −15 < m < 15, but m has to be an integer, so m ranges from −14 to 14.

Since 5m − 20 is increasing in m,

maximum will be at m = 14 → 5(14) − 20 = 50

minimum will be at m = −14 → 5(−14) − 20 = −90

Difference = −90 − 50 = −140, but this is not the answer because the question asks for smallest and greatest possible integer values of the expression, not just plugging extreme m directly without checking the full valid range impact on the expression.

Correct way is to directly apply bounds:

−15 < m < 15

→ −75 < 5m < 75

→ −95 < 5m − 20 < 55

So smallest integer = −94, greatest = 54

Difference = −94 − 54 = −148

2
G
gaurishi_
OP•7mos

So you mean the greatest and the least values are not at the extreme ends?

1
A
ayushb
•7mos

i think the mistake is using extreme values of m (−14, 14) whereas m can’t actually take boundary values

1
G
gaurishi_
OP•7mos

but the actual extremes are (-15,15), I've taken the closest integer within the range.

1
I
ishann
•7mos

ah that's where you went wrong, use the corner(boundary), you will get -95 and -55. you musn't take the boundary values. Take -94 and -54. By taking the closest integer, you are missing out on values that are in between.

2
G
gaurishi_
OP•7mos

Oh! now I get it. I understood where I fumbled. Thanks a lot.

1