like they aint mistakes, its just that their AI isnt working properly, and no human is even checking the solutions, the answers are just being copy pasted and thats it.
any mod,pls address this
Please log in to comment and participate in discussions.
CFBR
Please reply to the earlier post -- I had asked for a quick clarification if you found more than 3 errors because I was unable to find the same. Kindly confirm if the frustration was making you embellish the number.
I also am not able to find another account of yours + you've not shared the same -- making me unable to clarify the reports of your other account as claimed. Knowing this will allow us to run a quality check again.
Uh my bad this is my other acc, i did cuet mocks from this one, i only reported a few at the start but stopped later,ill report everything from now
Please let us know the username of your other account (you can send it via tickets to protect anonymity). We'll be able to check what was reported and if similar errors persist. Thank you!
this jaswanth is my other account.
I have experienced the same in a lot of CUET maths pyq topic tests' solutions and seldom even in the questions. I am tired of reporting them
yes, i dont report any questions mostly, cuz 1 or 2 mistakes happen and typing and explaining all that is kinda hard, but in this mock though like 4 in one mock is too much, so i just put a post so the mods can see and take some action. i saw some other posts as well saying AI solutions are becoming worse and stuff like that, hope some serious action is taken to fix it.
There's no harm in reporting questions -- just doing once allows us to see if any such kind of errors exist. Reporting is not rude or bad -- it helps us. It allows us to take action faster.
You don't even have to explain stuff if you don't have the bandwidth -- in the screenshots shown, it's pretty self-evident, just mark "formatting error" and submit!
--
Reg. other posts: please read the replies to the other posts, it was 3 questions out of the ~1000 BMSAT questions which humans had to manually read -- errors occur at times become it slips our eyes, a 0.3% is something which is much better than the industry average + the speed at which we correct things makes it better. Plus, as soon as it was reported, it was fixed.
Had you told us this earlier, we'd have checked our old mocks for the rendering issues.
I hope this makes sense. Our objective is to bring the 0.3% to 0%.
ok, ill report the question from next time, i thought ki if i report i need to write a whole ass paragraph for it, and honestly after a mock my brain is basically dead so my bad, i report it next time.
No need to write a whole paragraph if you don't have the bandwidth -- completely alright, if the formatting/rendering is an issue, that becomes obvious by looking at it!
I saw 4 such reports from your account wrt CUET Maths -- it was all in the tables which didn't render correctly (maths within tables), we've fixed that now. If there are any questions apart from those 4 reports, do let us know!
found another one
Title me in it's one mock, not once mock
From reasoning to GK. The cornerstone of a good CUET score.
Create an account to join our community and participate in discussions.
Heya,
These mocks were made last year! We made a small change in our math latex and how it is rendered, we didn't notice these errors in old mocks (we didn't expect it to cause an error in mocks we had already reviewed via humans).
These questions and solutions were made by real students who helped us with the same.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention, we'll go through all the old questions and re-check it. All the screenshots you've shown have been fixed!
If you notice any errors, just click on report -> "formatting issue" --> it takes less time than making a forum post too + allows us to fix right away.
FYI: The questions and answer-key is correct; it's the formatting that didn't render correctly -- we'll go through the existing mocks and re-check those!
Manually checked all GAT mocks (1100 questions), found a total of 5 rendering issues, fixed now.
Thank you for bringing it to our attention, ironically, only 1 out of the 5 was reported; had we known this earlier, we'd have checked our old content too!