Solution
| Paragraph | Summary |
|---|---|
| Para 1 | Lucia asks what "arenas of competition" means |
| Para 2 | Chris explains how top companies changed from 2005 to 2020 - new companies 8x bigger replaced old ones |
| Para 3 | Introduces "wizards vs muggles" - wizards play by different economic rules |
| Para 4 | Lucia asks what makes wizards different |
| Para 5 | Chris defines wizards: growth + dynamism. Dynamism = "shuffle rate" - how much bottom moves to top |
| Para 6-7 | Wizard industries have more economic profit and R&D |
From passage: "But there's another dimension or axis too, which is dynamism. That is measured by a new metric we've come up with called the 'shuffle rate.' How much does the bottom move to the top?"
Okay, so Chris is explaining what dynamism means -> he says it's measured by the "shuffle rate" -> this shuffle rate asks "how much does the bottom move to the top?" -> this means companies at the bottom are rising up fast -> positions are changing quickly -> that's what dynamic means!
Here's where students get confused: Options 1 and 4 talk about slow/stable things, but the passage is about rapid change. Option 3 is opposite (never-changing). Let's eliminate:
š“ Option 1 -> opposite-meaning -> says "slow, gradual" but dynamism means fast changes (shuffle rate = bottom moving to top quickly)
š¢ Option 2 is correct -> captures the idea perfectly: "rapid and frequent changes in leadership and market position" = companies moving up and down fast = shuffle rate
š“ Option 3 -> polar-opposite -> "never-changing" is the exact opposite of dynamism (which is all about change)
š“ Option 4 -> opposite-meaning -> "stability and predictability" are what muggle industries have, not wizard industries (which have high dynamism)
More from this set:
Question 37
Question 39