In this question, a question is followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and decide the appropriate answer.

Question: Amongst six people, I, J, K, L, M and N are sitting in a row, facing north, who sits at the extreme left end of the row?

(I) J sits fourth to the left of L. Both K and N are immediate neighbours of I. M sits at some place to the left of N.

(II) N sits fourth to the right of M. K sits third to the left of L. I sits to the immediate left of N.

The statement below is followed by two courses of actions, numbered I and II. Assume everything in the statement to be true.

Statement – A well-known food delivery company has received multiple complaints about late deliveries and poor food quality in the last quarter.

I. The company should review the food options of its partner restaurants.

II. The company should cap the number of orders each delivery person can take at peak hours.

Which course(s) of action logically follow on the basis of the information given in the statement.

Read the given statements and conclusions. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which conclusion(s) logically follow from the statements given below:

Statements: Some papers are curtains. No radio is a curtain. All jugs are papers.

Conclusion I: All jugs are curtains.

Conclusion II: Some papers are jugs.

Conclusion III: No radio is a jug.