Skip to main contentSkip to solution

In January 2015, Stephen Hawking along with Elon Musk and many Al experts, signed an open letter on artificial intelligence, calling for serious research into its impact on society. In the past, Elon Musk has warned that superhuman artificial intelligence is capable of providing incalculable benefits, but if deployed incautiously, will have an adverse effect on the human race. He and I sit on the scientific advisory board for Future of Life Institute, an organisation working to mitigate existential risk facing humanity. This called for concrete research on how we could prevent potential problems while also reaping the potential benefits Al offers us, and is designed to get Al researchers and developers to pay more attention to Al safety.

Recent developments in the advancement of Al include a call by the European Parliament for drafting a set of regulations to govern the creation of robots and Al. A report presented to the Parliament declares that the world is on the cusp of a new industrial robot revolution. It stresses that at all times researchers and designers should ensure all robotic design incorporates a kill switch. There is a possibility that within a few decades Al could surpass human intellectual capacity and challenge the human-robot relationship.

By 2025, there will be about 30 mega cities with more than 10 million inhabitants. Robots will definitely speed up the retail process, but to revolutionise shopping, they need to be fast enough to allow same-day delivery on every order. Recent Al landmarks such as self-driving cars, or a computer game winning at the game of Go, etc. are signs of what is to come. Enormous levels of investment are pouring into this technology which will eventually permeate every aspect of society including health care, work, education and science.

Our future is a race between the growing power of a technology and the wisdom with which we use it!

The passage is primarily concerned with:

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 1,4

Option 1 → Correct -> The passage explicitly calls for serious research into AI's societal impact, with the Future of Life Institute and the open letter both emphasizing the need for structured AI safety research.

Option 2 → Incorrect -> Kill switches are a minor detail — too narrow to represent the passage's primary concern.

Option 3 → Incorrect -> Atmospheric threats and space ambitions are entirely absent from the passage.

Option 4 → Correct -> Every major point feeds into AI's dual nature: potential versus existential risk... as mentioned in the closing line: "Our future is a race between the growing power of a technology and the wisdom with which we use it."


Hence, Options 1 and 4 are both correct — Option 4 as the dominant theme, Option 1 as an integral supporting strand woven throughout.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question