Solution
Option 1 -> Her actions of distributing arms, ammunition, and freedom literature were driven by her desire to free India from British colonial rule.
Option 2 -> The passage shows her actions were purposeful and organized toward independence, not random aggression or inherent belligerence.
Option 3 -> The passage states she initially intended to emigrate to the USA, and there's no indication she wanted to settle back in India permanently.
Option 4 -> Her struggle was against British tyranny in India, not against the Philippines government where she was organizing Indians.
Hence, Option 1: love for her motherland -> Despite facing economic hardships that forced her to leave India, she joined the Ghadar Party and dedicated herself to organizing Indians abroad, gathering weapons and funds, and mobilizing support for India's freedom movement. Her willingness to face torture in Lahore Fort for two years under sedition charges further demonstrates that her revolutionary activities stemmed from deep patriotism and love for India, not personal gain or random violence -> correct