Solution
| Para 1 | Anger and online harm |
| Para 2 | Rage bait distorts reality |
| Para 3 | Blocking as resistance |
From passage: "If you block the accounts that most inflame you, you deprive them of your attention... Blocking even hurts them with the algorithm."
Thought Process Breakdown:
The question asks how rage bait can be addressed.
-> Find the action suggested by the author.
-> Para 3 says: block the accounts that inflame you.
-> Blocking removes your attention.
-> It also hurts them with the algorithm.
So, the answer is blocking inflammatory content.
Option Analysis:
š“ Option 1 -> Opposite Meaning -> Social media rage bait is shown as the problem, not the solution.
š“ Option 2 -> Problem, Not Solution -> Algohacking anger is what the passage criticises.
š“ Option 3 -> Opposite Meaning -> More attention to hateful propaganda helps rage bait.
š¢ Option 4 -> Correct -> Blocking inflammatory sites/accounts is the author's solution.
More from this passage:
Question 12