10:[["$","title","0",{"children":"CUET English - How were the microbes in the rock confirmed to be indigenous? | PYQs + Solutions | AfterBoards"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"description","content":"undefined Option 1 -> The passa>= does not mention testing microbes in nutrient-rich environments to confirm their origin. Option 2 -> DNA comparison to surface microbes is not mentioned as the confirmation method used. Option 3 -> The passa>= explicitly states \"DNA staining and imaging with advanced microscopes confirmed the microbes were indi>=nous, with intact cell walls.\" Option 4 -> Clay deposits provided nutrients but were not used to confirm the microbes were indi>=nous.

Hence, Option 3 -> The researchers used DNA staining combined with advanced microscopy to verify the microbes were native to the rock and not contamination, as evidenced by their intact cell walls and cellular structure -> correct"}],["$","link","2",{"rel":"manifest","href":"https://www.afterboards.in/manifest.json","crossOrigin":"$undefined"}],["$","meta","3",{"name":"keywords","content":"CUETENG,ENG,Reading Comprehension,Passage"}],["$","meta","4",{"name":"robots","content":"index, follow"}],["$","meta","5",{"name":"category","content":"education"}],["$","meta","6",{"name":"google-site-verification","content":"google"}],["$","meta","7",{"property":"og:title","content":"CUET English - How were the microbes in the rock confirmed to be indigenous? | PYQs + Solutions"}],["$","meta","8",{"property":"og:description","content":"undefined Option 1 -> The passa>= does not mention testing microbes in nutrient-rich environments to confirm their origin. Option 2 -> DNA comparison to surface microbes is not mentioned as the confirmation method used. Option 3 -> The passa>= explicitly states \"DNA staining and imaging with advanced microscopes confirmed the microbes were indi>=nous, with intact cell walls.\" Option 4 -> Clay deposits provided nutrients but were not used to confirm the microbes were indi>=nous.

Hence, Option 3 -> The researchers used DNA staining combined with advanced microscopy to verify the microbes were native to the rock and not contamination, as evidenced by their intact cell walls and cellular structure -> correct"}],["$","meta","9",{"property":"og:url","content":"https://www.afterboards.in/past-year-questions/cuet-english/2025/slot-8/8"}],["$","meta","10",{"property":"og:site_name","content":"AfterBoards | CUET English Preparation"}],["$","meta","11",{"property":"og:image","content":"https://www.afterboards.in/pyp/AfterBoards%20CUET%20Past%20Year%20Papers%20with%20Solutions.webp"}],["$","meta","12",{"property":"og:type","content":"website"}],["$","meta","13",{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],["$","meta","14",{"name":"twitter:site","content":"afterboards.in"}],["$","meta","15",{"name":"twitter:title","content":"CUET English - How were the microbes in the rock confirmed to be indigenous? | PYQs + Solutions"}],["$","meta","16",{"name":"twitter:description","content":"undefined Option 1 -> The passa>= does not mention testing microbes in nutrient-rich environments to confirm their origin. Option 2 -> DNA comparison to surface microbes is not mentioned as the confirmation method used. Option 3 -> The passa>= explicitly states \"DNA staining and imaging with advanced microscopes confirmed the microbes were indi>=nous, with intact cell walls.\" Option 4 -> Clay deposits provided nutrients but were not used to confirm the microbes were indi>=nous.

Hence, Option 3 -> The researchers used DNA staining combined with advanced microscopy to verify the microbes were native to the rock and not contamination, as evidenced by their intact cell walls and cellular structure -> correct"}],"$L18","$L19","$L1a","$L1b","$L1c","$L1d","$L1e","$L1f","$L20","$L21"]

CUET English 2025 20 May Shift 2 PYQs

Keyboard Shortcuts