Skip to main contentSkip to solution

People came to him when the patient was on his last legs. Dr. Raman often burst out, "Why couldn't you have come a day earlier?" The reason was obvious - the visiting fee was twenty-five rupees, and more than that, people liked to shirk the fact that the time had come to call Dr. Raman: for them there was something ominous in the very association. As a result, when the big man came on the scene, it was always a quick decision one way or another. There was no scope or time for any kind of wavering or wholesaling.

Long years of practice had bred in the doctor a certain curt truthfulness; for that very reason, his opinion was valued; he was not a mere doctor expressing an opinion but a judge pronouncing a verdict. The patient's life hung on his words. This never unduly worried him. He never believed that agreeable words ever saved lives. He did not think it was any of his business to provide unnecessary hope when, as a matter of course, nature would tell them the truth in a few hours. However, when he glimpsed the faintest sign of hope, he rolled up his sleeve and stepped into the arena: it might be hours or days, but he never withdrew till he wrested the prize from the Yama's hands.

Today, the doctor felt that he himself needed someone to tell him soothing lies. He mopped his brow and sat down beside the bed where lay his dearest friend in the world.

What is the primary theme reflected in this passage?

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 3

Option 1 -> While the passage mentions the twenty-five rupee fee, financial planning is merely contextual background, not the central theme.

Option 2 -> Death and fate are present in the passage, but they serve as the backdrop for exploring the doctor's professional approach rather than being the primary focus.

Option 3 -> The passage extensively explores Dr. Raman's "curt truthfulness," his rejection of "agreeable words" and "unnecessary hope," contrasted with his relentless fight when hope exists, and culminates in his own need for "soothing lies" - clearly highlighting the tension between honesty and compassion.

Option 4 -> The passage focuses on the doctor's character and ethical approach, not on any limitations of medical science.


Hence, Option 3 -> The entire narrative revolves around Dr. Raman's philosophy of delivering harsh truths ("not a mere doctor expressing an opinion but a judge pronouncing a verdict") versus the emotional burden this creates, ultimately showing him needing compassion himself when his dearest friend lies ill. This perfectly captures the delicate balance between professional honesty and human compassion in medical practice -> correct

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question