Solution
Option 1 -> The narrator was not indifferent; he explicitly states "I was prepared to dislike" Mr. Kelada before meeting him, showing strong negative feelings rather than detachment.
Option 2 -> Prejudice is clearly present (judging before meeting based solely on his name), and aversion is evident in his dismay and growing dislike of Mr. Kelada's intrusive behaviour — making this a valid characterisation of the narrator's initial attitude.
Option 3 -> The opposite is true; the narrator shows no curiosity or admiration, only negative preconceptions and growing dislike from their first encounter.
Option 4 -> The narrator's "prepared to dislike" before meeting, being "dismayed" at learning his name, and immediate dislike of his "intrusive behaviour" demonstrate intense, visceral negative feelings from the outset — making this equally valid.
Both Option 2: prejudice and aversion and Option 4: abhorrence and disgust have been awarded marks as correct answers.
Option 2 captures the pre-judgement aspect — the narrator forms a negative opinion before even meeting Mr. Kelada, purely based on his name and luggage, which is textbook prejudice coupled with aversion.
Option 4 captures the intensity of those feelings — the visceral dismay, the immediate repulsion toward his appearance, accent, and behaviour pointing to something deeper than mild dislike.
Both options are therefore correct as they describe different but equally valid dimensions of the narrator's initial attitude.
More from this set:
Question 11