Skip to main contentSkip to solution

I was prepared to dislike Max Kelada before I met him. The war had just ended, and accommodation on the ship was scarce. I was relieved to have a cabin with only one other passenger, but when I learned his name, I was dismayed. His large luggage, covered in numerous labels, suggested he was a man of excess. When we met, he greeted me warmly, claiming to be English, despite his foreign appearance and accent. Prohibition was in force and the ship was dry, but he insisted we share drinks. Mr. Kelada was chatty, boastful, and familiar, using no formality despite our status as strangers. I disliked his intrusive behaviour, especially when he interrupted my game of Patience and insisted on showing me card tricks.

Mr. Kelada soon became the centre of attention. He managed activities, organised events, and knew everyone on board. Though he was the most disliked person on the ship, he was oblivious to it, always assuming others were as happy to see him as he was to see them. At mealtimes, he monopolised conversations, arguing passionately. We called him Mr. Know-All which he took as a compliment. It was an affront to his overweening vanity that you should disagree with him. He would not drop a subject, however unimportant, till he had brought you round to his way of thinking. The possibility that he could be mistaken never occurred to him. The only other person who could match his arrogance was Ramsay, and their acrimonious and interminable debates made the trip even more unbearable.

Mr. Know-All seems to be a knowledgeable, sociable and humorous person, yet the narrator doesn't take to him. What does this tell you about the narrator?

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 1

Option 1 -> The narrator recognizes that beneath Mr. Kelada's outward charm lies genuinely problematic behavior: he's intrusive, boastful, argumentative, and refuses to accept he could ever be wrong.

Option 2 -> There is no textual evidence suggesting the narrator experiences any identity crisis; his dislike is based on observable behaviors, not internal psychological conflict.

Option 3 -> The narrator has reasonable social boundaries; Mr. Kelada's behaviors (monopolizing conversations, refusing to drop arguments, being intrusive) aren't "healthy conversations" but rather domineering conduct.

Option 4 -> The passage explicitly states Mr. Kelada was "the most disliked person on the ship," meaning others shared the narrator's view; this isn't about jealousy but recognizing genuinely annoying behavior.


Hence, Option 1 -> The narrator demonstrates perceptiveness rather than prejudice. While Mr. Kelada may appear sociable and knowledgeable superficially, the narrator accurately identifies his fundamental flaws: arrogance ("overweening vanity"), intrusiveness (interrupting the card game uninvited), and inability to accept disagreement. The fact that others on the ship also disliked him confirms the narrator's judgment is sound, not merely personal bias -> correct

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question