Solution
Option 1 -> The passage explicitly states "India stands not as a mere spectator but as a prominent player in the global solar revolution" - this can be directly inferred.
Option 2 -> Multiple government schemes (PLI, Solar Park Scheme, PM-KUSUM, Rooftop Solar Programme) are mentioned as driving India towards 500 GW renewable capacity by 2030 - this can be inferred.
Option 3 -> The passage clearly mentions "schemes such as PM-KUSUM aimed to achieve solar power capacity addition of 30.8 GW by March 2026 are transforming India's agricultural sector" - this can be inferred.
Option 4 -> The passage states "the solar industry's declining costs, enhanced energy storage solutions, and grid advancements take centre stage" - this directly contradicts the statement about "enhanced costs and no energy storage solution."
Hence, Option 4 -> The passage actually mentions "declining costs" and "enhanced energy storage solutions," which is the complete opposite of what this statement claims. This statement cannot be inferred and actually contradicts the information provided in the passage -> correct