Skip to main contentSkip to solution

The arts—be it music, dance, or painting—have enabled artists to express themselves freely across borders for eons. However, speaking a common language remains one of the easiest and most effective ways for people to communicate and understand one another. India has a cornucopia of regional languages and dialects, an integral part of each region’s cultural heritage. No national language has ever been declared, and many regional languages are endangered or extinct due to inadequate documentation.

Nagaland, home to 19 languages and 16 tribes, exemplifies this linguistic richness. To preserve them, Nagaland University recently organized a convention focused on their documentation and promotion. Language, as a key element of culture, plays a pivotal role in shaping regional identities, as seen in the prevalence of Russian in Kazakhstan or English in India. While Indian English writers like Salman Rushdie have global recognition, regional languages remain vital for connecting with local heritage.

The National Education Policy 2020 emphasizes the importance of learning one’s mother tongue, which connects individuals to their roots and offers insights into local traditions. Languages like Pali, which preserve the teachings of Lord Buddha, and Sanskrit, the language of the Upanishads, offer invaluable cultural and spiritual wisdom. With languages such as Aka-Bo from the Andaman Islands disappearing, documenting these endangered tongues is crucial. The loss of such languages erases not only communication but entire histories. While technology, such as translation apps, helps bridge linguistic gaps, the onus remains on the people to protect, preserve, and promote this invaluable part of India’s cultural heritage.

According to the passage, what is the consequence of losing regional languages?

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 2

Option 1 -> The passage does not mention global communication gaps as a consequence of language loss.

Option 2 -> Directly stated in the passage: "The loss of such languages erases not only communication but entire histories."

Option 3 -> Contradictory - if languages are lost, local traditions cannot be fully preserved as language is key to cultural heritage.

Option 4 -> This is circular - the decline itself cannot be the consequence of the decline.


Hence, Option 2: Erasure of entire histories and cultural identities -> The passage explicitly mentions that losing endangered languages like Aka-Bo results in erasing "not only communication but entire histories," emphasizing that language loss means the disappearance of cultural and historical knowledge embedded in those languages -> correct

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question