Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Part of our programme included spending an afternoon on a machaan that overlooked a waterhole in the forest. Our riding elephants dropped us off, and we were given strict instructions to remain put until later, the elephants would come to pick us up.

So we sat, hoping that a tiger or leopard would come down for a drink. No such luck. After a while, a juvenile rhesus macaque poked its head out and looked around warily. Then, taking infinitesimal care, it emerged into the clearing cautiously. If it had been born and brought up in Delhi, it would have probably charged out, clambered up our machaan and relieved us of our drinking water and snacks. But not this fellow. I thought these forest monkeys were such wimps!

It was getting darker by the minute- and there was no sign of our elephant pickups. So we decided to trek back to Dhikala. We set off in single file along the forest path. When I was suddenly confronted by all the pioneering leaders rushing pell-mell back urgently whispering, 'mad elephant, mad elephant!' I saw the bulk of an elephant- I can't vouch if its head was aggressively cocked and trunk rolled up, appraising us prior to charging. Incontinently, we fled, to our machaan and clambered up.

One spank from its trunk would have sent any of us flying clear across the waterhole! We could only sit quietly. I realised that the juvenile rhesus had a very good reason for being so cautious. We had not.

The juvenile rhesus ______ the author by reflecting an overtly ______ approach.

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 1

Option 1: impressed: calm -> The author ultimately realized the monkey's cautious behavior was wise after their own dangerous encounter, and the monkey's measured, careful approach reflected composure.

Option 2: disappointed: discreet -> Initially the author thought the monkeys were "wimps," but this was a temporary reaction that changed after the elephant incident, not the final takeaway.

Option 3: angered: destructive -> The monkey's cautious behavior neither angered the author nor was it destructive in any way.

Option 4: amused: clownish -> The monkey's wary, careful behavior was serious and survival-oriented, not silly or comical.


Hence, Option 1: impressed: calm -> The author's realization at the end ("I realised that the juvenile rhesus had a very good reason for being so cautious. We had not.") shows they were ultimately impressed by the monkey's wisdom. The monkey's infinitesimally careful and wary approach reflected a calm, composed demeanor appropriate for the dangerous forest environment, unlike the author's group who recklessly ventured out and had to flee from the elephant -> correct

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question