CUET English: Verbal AbilityPassage. Free, no login required.

During Reva's first year working with the romance tours in Ukraine, when bachelors asked her about her day job and she was in a rare mood to divulge, she'd frame what she did as a rescue mission. She was plucking endangered snails from their shrinking habitats and reviving their populations in captivity. One day, she'd reintroduced them into ecologically protected zones of which there were few, but Rome wasn't built in a day. She toured all around the country, including the self-proclaimed People's Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, where the war puttered on.

She evacuated survivors even if she didn't have room for them. She had vowed never to repeat one of her early mistakes: once, she'd chosen not to rescue the dozen Annilika severus from their ravine at the base of the Carpathians, but by the time she came back for them, new terrarium at the ready, the ravine had been filled by a mudslide. She never saw another Annilika severus snail again. And she witnessed just enough miracles to blind her with hope: two rare Tordionus bazilikae on an onion stalk sticking out of a dumpster, when she wasn't looking for them. Another time, a cluster of newborns at the edge of a military range. These early successes had to be signs- she was destined for this rescue mission.

She and her charges would outpace environmental destruction. It wasn't impossible, after all. She'd steer her Noah's Ark to every nook and cranny of the country, no leaf unturned. "A dangerous thing, early success," a bachelor told her during one date, describing his own investment ventures. A jackpot in his early 20s had led him to believe in his own so-called instincts until he hit financial ruin. But Reva was hardly listening. Her interpreter had long ago wilted into her martini, and Reva's eyes were glued to the terrarium cam on her phone looking at her snails. These dates were but a sham to get the financially well-off bachelors to invest in her lab.

During Reva's first year working with the romance tours in Ukraine, when bachelors asked her about her day job and she was in a rare mood to divulge, she'd frame what she did as a rescue mission. She was plucking endangered snails from their shrinking habitats and reviving their populations in captivity. One day, she'd reintroduced them into ecologically protected zones of which there were few, but Rome wasn't built in a day. She toured all around the country, including the self-proclaimed People's Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, where the war puttered on.

She evacuated survivors even if she didn't have room for them. She had vowed never to repeat one of her early mistakes: once, she'd chosen not to rescue the dozen Annilika severus from their ravine at the base of the Carpathians, but by the time she came back for them, new terrarium at the ready, the ravine had been filled by a mudslide. She never saw another Annilika severus snail again. And she witnessed just enough miracles to blind her with hope: two rare Tordionus bazilikae on an onion stalk sticking out of a dumpster, when she wasn't looking for them. Another time, a cluster of newborns at the edge of a military range. These early successes had to be signs- she was destined for this rescue mission.

She and her charges would outpace environmental destruction. It wasn't impossible, after all. She'd steer her Noah's Ark to every nook and cranny of the country, no leaf unturned. "A dangerous thing, early success," a bachelor told her during one date, describing his own investment ventures. A jackpot in his early 20s had led him to believe in his own so-called instincts until he hit financial ruin. But Reva was hardly listening. Her interpreter had long ago wilted into her martini, and Reva's eyes were glued to the terrarium cam on her phone looking at her snails. These dates were but a sham to get the financially well-off bachelors to invest in her lab.

During Reva's first year working with the romance tours in Ukraine, when bachelors asked her about her day job and she was in a rare mood to divulge, she'd frame what she did as a rescue mission. She was plucking endangered snails from their shrinking habitats and reviving their populations in captivity. One day, she'd reintroduced them into ecologically protected zones of which there were few, but Rome wasn't built in a day. She toured all around the country, including the self-proclaimed People's Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, where the war puttered on.

She evacuated survivors even if she didn't have room for them. She had vowed never to repeat one of her early mistakes: once, she'd chosen not to rescue the dozen Annilika severus from their ravine at the base of the Carpathians, but by the time she came back for them, new terrarium at the ready, the ravine had been filled by a mudslide. She never saw another Annilika severus snail again. And she witnessed just enough miracles to blind her with hope: two rare Tordionus bazilikae on an onion stalk sticking out of a dumpster, when she wasn't looking for them. Another time, a cluster of newborns at the edge of a military range. These early successes had to be signs- she was destined for this rescue mission.

She and her charges would outpace environmental destruction. It wasn't impossible, after all. She'd steer her Noah's Ark to every nook and cranny of the country, no leaf unturned. "A dangerous thing, early success," a bachelor told her during one date, describing his own investment ventures. A jackpot in his early 20s had led him to believe in his own so-called instincts until he hit financial ruin. But Reva was hardly listening. Her interpreter had long ago wilted into her martini, and Reva's eyes were glued to the terrarium cam on her phone looking at her snails. These dates were but a sham to get the financially well-off bachelors to invest in her lab.

During Reva's first year working with the romance tours in Ukraine, when bachelors asked her about her day job and she was in a rare mood to divulge, she'd frame what she did as a rescue mission. She was plucking endangered snails from their shrinking habitats and reviving their populations in captivity. One day, she'd reintroduced them into ecologically protected zones of which there were few, but Rome wasn't built in a day. She toured all around the country, including the self-proclaimed People's Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, where the war puttered on.

She evacuated survivors even if she didn't have room for them. She had vowed never to repeat one of her early mistakes: once, she'd chosen not to rescue the dozen Annilika severus from their ravine at the base of the Carpathians, but by the time she came back for them, new terrarium at the ready, the ravine had been filled by a mudslide. She never saw another Annilika severus snail again. And she witnessed just enough miracles to blind her with hope: two rare Tordionus bazilikae on an onion stalk sticking out of a dumpster, when she wasn't looking for them. Another time, a cluster of newborns at the edge of a military range. These early successes had to be signs- she was destined for this rescue mission.

She and her charges would outpace environmental destruction. It wasn't impossible, after all. She'd steer her Noah's Ark to every nook and cranny of the country, no leaf unturned. "A dangerous thing, early success," a bachelor told her during one date, describing his own investment ventures. A jackpot in his early 20s had led him to believe in his own so-called instincts until he hit financial ruin. But Reva was hardly listening. Her interpreter had long ago wilted into her martini, and Reva's eyes were glued to the terrarium cam on her phone looking at her snails. These dates were but a sham to get the financially well-off bachelors to invest in her lab.

During Reva's first year working with the romance tours in Ukraine, when bachelors asked her about her day job and she was in a rare mood to divulge, she'd frame what she did as a rescue mission. She was plucking endangered snails from their shrinking habitats and reviving their populations in captivity. One day, she'd reintroduced them into ecologically protected zones of which there were few, but Rome wasn't built in a day. She toured all around the country, including the self-proclaimed People's Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, where the war puttered on.

She evacuated survivors even if she didn't have room for them. She had vowed never to repeat one of her early mistakes: once, she'd chosen not to rescue the dozen Annilika severus from their ravine at the base of the Carpathians, but by the time she came back for them, new terrarium at the ready, the ravine had been filled by a mudslide. She never saw another Annilika severus snail again. And she witnessed just enough miracles to blind her with hope: two rare Tordionus bazilikae on an onion stalk sticking out of a dumpster, when she wasn't looking for them. Another time, a cluster of newborns at the edge of a military range. These early successes had to be signs- she was destined for this rescue mission.

She and her charges would outpace environmental destruction. It wasn't impossible, after all. She'd steer her Noah's Ark to every nook and cranny of the country, no leaf unturned. "A dangerous thing, early success," a bachelor told her during one date, describing his own investment ventures. A jackpot in his early 20s had led him to believe in his own so-called instincts until he hit financial ruin. But Reva was hardly listening. Her interpreter had long ago wilted into her martini, and Reva's eyes were glued to the terrarium cam on her phone looking at her snails. These dates were but a sham to get the financially well-off bachelors to invest in her lab.

New York City's Central Park can feel like an untouched slice of nature in the heart of Manhattan, but every square foot of the 843-acre park was carefully planned and constructed. When New York legislators approved construction of a massive urban park in 1853—the first of its kind in the United States—they chose some of the least attractive land in the city. "It was junk land," says Cynthia Brenwall, a conservator at the New York Municipal Archives. "It was not nice, beautiful and hilly like it is now. It was rocky and full of bogs. There were gross tanneries and bone-boiling plants. It was attractive because it was easily attainable."

The transformation of "junk land" into one of the most-visited and beloved parks in the world required one of the largest public works projects in 19th-century America. From 1857 to 1866, more than 20,000 labourers armed with pickaxes, carts and gunpowder removed and reworked nearly 7 million cubic feet of rock and soil to shape Central Park into the verdant work of public art it is today.

From 1840 to 1850, the population of New York City grew from 327,000 to almost 600,000. The vast majority of New Yorkers still lived in the southern tip of Manhattan, but city planners predicted the growing metropolis would soon cover the whole island. If New York was going to be a world-class city at par with Paris and London, it needed an open green space like the Tuileries Garden or Hyde Park where residents could escape the noise and pollution of city life. "Poor New Yorkers who lived in tenements weren't going out into the country on the weekends," says Brenwall, author of The Central Park: Original Designs for New York's Greatest Treasure. "They didn't summer in the Hamptons. They worked six days a week and had one day to recuperate. Central Park was supposed to be a way to be out in the 'country' without leaving the city."

New York City's Central Park can feel like an untouched slice of nature in the heart of Manhattan, but every square foot of the 843-acre park was carefully planned and constructed. When New York legislators approved construction of a massive urban park in 1853—the first of its kind in the United States—they chose some of the least attractive land in the city. "It was junk land," says Cynthia Brenwall, a conservator at the New York Municipal Archives. "It was not nice, beautiful and hilly like it is now. It was rocky and full of bogs. There were gross tanneries and bone-boiling plants. It was attractive because it was easily attainable."

The transformation of "junk land" into one of the most-visited and beloved parks in the world required one of the largest public works projects in 19th-century America. From 1857 to 1866, more than 20,000 labourers armed with pickaxes, carts and gunpowder removed and reworked nearly 7 million cubic feet of rock and soil to shape Central Park into the verdant work of public art it is today.

From 1840 to 1850, the population of New York City grew from 327,000 to almost 600,000. The vast majority of New Yorkers still lived in the southern tip of Manhattan, but city planners predicted the growing metropolis would soon cover the whole island. If New York was going to be a world-class city at par with Paris and London, it needed an open green space like the Tuileries Garden or Hyde Park where residents could escape the noise and pollution of city life. "Poor New Yorkers who lived in tenements weren't going out into the country on the weekends," says Brenwall, author of The Central Park: Original Designs for New York's Greatest Treasure. "They didn't summer in the Hamptons. They worked six days a week and had one day to recuperate. Central Park was supposed to be a way to be out in the 'country' without leaving the city."

New York City's Central Park can feel like an untouched slice of nature in the heart of Manhattan, but every square foot of the 843-acre park was carefully planned and constructed. When New York legislators approved construction of a massive urban park in 1853—the first of its kind in the United States—they chose some of the least attractive land in the city. "It was junk land," says Cynthia Brenwall, a conservator at the New York Municipal Archives. "It was not nice, beautiful and hilly like it is now. It was rocky and full of bogs. There were gross tanneries and bone-boiling plants. It was attractive because it was easily attainable."

The transformation of "junk land" into one of the most-visited and beloved parks in the world required one of the largest public works projects in 19th-century America. From 1857 to 1866, more than 20,000 labourers armed with pickaxes, carts and gunpowder removed and reworked nearly 7 million cubic feet of rock and soil to shape Central Park into the verdant work of public art it is today.

From 1840 to 1850, the population of New York City grew from 327,000 to almost 600,000. The vast majority of New Yorkers still lived in the southern tip of Manhattan, but city planners predicted the growing metropolis would soon cover the whole island. If New York was going to be a world-class city at par with Paris and London, it needed an open green space like the Tuileries Garden or Hyde Park where residents could escape the noise and pollution of city life. "Poor New Yorkers who lived in tenements weren't going out into the country on the weekends," says Brenwall, author of The Central Park: Original Designs for New York's Greatest Treasure. "They didn't summer in the Hamptons. They worked six days a week and had one day to recuperate. Central Park was supposed to be a way to be out in the 'country' without leaving the city."

New York City's Central Park can feel like an untouched slice of nature in the heart of Manhattan, but every square foot of the 843-acre park was carefully planned and constructed. When New York legislators approved construction of a massive urban park in 1853—the first of its kind in the United States—they chose some of the least attractive land in the city. "It was junk land," says Cynthia Brenwall, a conservator at the New York Municipal Archives. "It was not nice, beautiful and hilly like it is now. It was rocky and full of bogs. There were gross tanneries and bone-boiling plants. It was attractive because it was easily attainable."

The transformation of "junk land" into one of the most-visited and beloved parks in the world required one of the largest public works projects in 19th-century America. From 1857 to 1866, more than 20,000 labourers armed with pickaxes, carts and gunpowder removed and reworked nearly 7 million cubic feet of rock and soil to shape Central Park into the verdant work of public art it is today.

From 1840 to 1850, the population of New York City grew from 327,000 to almost 600,000. The vast majority of New Yorkers still lived in the southern tip of Manhattan, but city planners predicted the growing metropolis would soon cover the whole island. If New York was going to be a world-class city at par with Paris and London, it needed an open green space like the Tuileries Garden or Hyde Park where residents could escape the noise and pollution of city life. "Poor New Yorkers who lived in tenements weren't going out into the country on the weekends," says Brenwall, author of The Central Park: Original Designs for New York's Greatest Treasure. "They didn't summer in the Hamptons. They worked six days a week and had one day to recuperate. Central Park was supposed to be a way to be out in the 'country' without leaving the city."

New York City's Central Park can feel like an untouched slice of nature in the heart of Manhattan, but every square foot of the 843-acre park was carefully planned and constructed. When New York legislators approved construction of a massive urban park in 1853—the first of its kind in the United States—they chose some of the least attractive land in the city. "It was junk land," says Cynthia Brenwall, a conservator at the New York Municipal Archives. "It was not nice, beautiful and hilly like it is now. It was rocky and full of bogs. There were gross tanneries and bone-boiling plants. It was attractive because it was easily attainable."

The transformation of "junk land" into one of the most-visited and beloved parks in the world required one of the largest public works projects in 19th-century America. From 1857 to 1866, more than 20,000 labourers armed with pickaxes, carts and gunpowder removed and reworked nearly 7 million cubic feet of rock and soil to shape Central Park into the verdant work of public art it is today.

From 1840 to 1850, the population of New York City grew from 327,000 to almost 600,000. The vast majority of New Yorkers still lived in the southern tip of Manhattan, but city planners predicted the growing metropolis would soon cover the whole island. If New York was going to be a world-class city at par with Paris and London, it needed an open green space like the Tuileries Garden or Hyde Park where residents could escape the noise and pollution of city life. "Poor New Yorkers who lived in tenements weren't going out into the country on the weekends," says Brenwall, author of The Central Park: Original Designs for New York's Greatest Treasure. "They didn't summer in the Hamptons. They worked six days a week and had one day to recuperate. Central Park was supposed to be a way to be out in the 'country' without leaving the city."

Patience: Silent Rhythm Of Fulfilment.

We live in an age where the world refreshes itself every few seconds. A click expects a result, a message expects a reply, and a thought expects an outcome—instantly. Patience, once revered as a virtue, now feels like an outdated app waiting to be deleted. Impatience wears the disguise of ambition. Quickness is applauded.

This collective restlessness is not trivial. It is reshaping how we think, work, and even feel. We have become experts at beginning things and amateurs at staying with them. The moment something takes longer than expected—a career, a relationship, a skill, a spiritual practice—our attention drifts. We scroll away from discomfort. We move on before something has had a chance to mature.

Etymologically, the word "patience" comes from the Latin "patientia", which means 'suffering' or 'enduring'. But its philosophical significance has always been closer to fulfilment than to suffering. Patience is not merely the ability to wait; it is the ability to inhabit the waiting fully. It is not about standing still while tapping your foot. It is about becoming quite enough to notice the unfolding of the moment itself.

When we act with impatience, our focus is consumed by the result. We perform the act like a courier delivering a package—hurriedly, impersonally, eager to be done. Patience, on the other hand, allows us to savor the process. A musician who practices slowly, a potter who waits for the clay to set, a gardener who tends to saplings through changing seasons—they all know that the real joy is not in the applause, the sale, or the bloom. It is in the act of becoming one with the process.

In a world with shrinking attention spans, patience is a form of resistance. It is not passive resignation; it is active trust. To stay with a question before rushing to answer it. To keep showing up even when there's no applause. To water the seed even when there is no sign of green.

Patience: Silent Rhythm Of Fulfilment.

We live in an age where the world refreshes itself every few seconds. A click expects a result, a message expects a reply, and a thought expects an outcome—instantly. Patience, once revered as a virtue, now feels like an outdated app waiting to be deleted. Impatience wears the disguise of ambition. Quickness is applauded.

This collective restlessness is not trivial. It is reshaping how we think, work, and even feel. We have become experts at beginning things and amateurs at staying with them. The moment something takes longer than expected—a career, a relationship, a skill, a spiritual practice—our attention drifts. We scroll away from discomfort. We move on before something has had a chance to mature.

Etymologically, the word "patience" comes from the Latin "patientia", which means 'suffering' or 'enduring'. But its philosophical significance has always been closer to fulfilment than to suffering. Patience is not merely the ability to wait; it is the ability to inhabit the waiting fully. It is not about standing still while tapping your foot. It is about becoming quite enough to notice the unfolding of the moment itself.

When we act with impatience, our focus is consumed by the result. We perform the act like a courier delivering a package—hurriedly, impersonally, eager to be done. Patience, on the other hand, allows us to savor the process. A musician who practices slowly, a potter who waits for the clay to set, a gardener who tends to saplings through changing seasons—they all know that the real joy is not in the applause, the sale, or the bloom. It is in the act of becoming one with the process.

In a world with shrinking attention spans, patience is a form of resistance. It is not passive resignation; it is active trust. To stay with a question before rushing to answer it. To keep showing up even when there's no applause. To water the seed even when there is no sign of green.

Patience: Silent Rhythm Of Fulfilment.

We live in an age where the world refreshes itself every few seconds. A click expects a result, a message expects a reply, and a thought expects an outcome—instantly. Patience, once revered as a virtue, now feels like an outdated app waiting to be deleted. Impatience wears the disguise of ambition. Quickness is applauded.

This collective restlessness is not trivial. It is reshaping how we think, work, and even feel. We have become experts at beginning things and amateurs at staying with them. The moment something takes longer than expected—a career, a relationship, a skill, a spiritual practice—our attention drifts. We scroll away from discomfort. We move on before something has had a chance to mature.

Etymologically, the word "patience" comes from the Latin "patientia", which means 'suffering' or 'enduring'. But its philosophical significance has always been closer to fulfilment than to suffering. Patience is not merely the ability to wait; it is the ability to inhabit the waiting fully. It is not about standing still while tapping your foot. It is about becoming quite enough to notice the unfolding of the moment itself.

When we act with impatience, our focus is consumed by the result. We perform the act like a courier delivering a package—hurriedly, impersonally, eager to be done. Patience, on the other hand, allows us to savor the process. A musician who practices slowly, a potter who waits for the clay to set, a gardener who tends to saplings through changing seasons—they all know that the real joy is not in the applause, the sale, or the bloom. It is in the act of becoming one with the process.

In a world with shrinking attention spans, patience is a form of resistance. It is not passive resignation; it is active trust. To stay with a question before rushing to answer it. To keep showing up even when there's no applause. To water the seed even when there is no sign of green.

Patience: Silent Rhythm Of Fulfilment.

We live in an age where the world refreshes itself every few seconds. A click expects a result, a message expects a reply, and a thought expects an outcome—instantly. Patience, once revered as a virtue, now feels like an outdated app waiting to be deleted. Impatience wears the disguise of ambition. Quickness is applauded.

This collective restlessness is not trivial. It is reshaping how we think, work, and even feel. We have become experts at beginning things and amateurs at staying with them. The moment something takes longer than expected—a career, a relationship, a skill, a spiritual practice—our attention drifts. We scroll away from discomfort. We move on before something has had a chance to mature.

Etymologically, the word "patience" comes from the Latin "patientia", which means 'suffering' or 'enduring'. But its philosophical significance has always been closer to fulfilment than to suffering. Patience is not merely the ability to wait; it is the ability to inhabit the waiting fully. It is not about standing still while tapping your foot. It is about becoming quite enough to notice the unfolding of the moment itself.

When we act with impatience, our focus is consumed by the result. We perform the act like a courier delivering a package—hurriedly, impersonally, eager to be done. Patience, on the other hand, allows us to savor the process. A musician who practices slowly, a potter who waits for the clay to set, a gardener who tends to saplings through changing seasons—they all know that the real joy is not in the applause, the sale, or the bloom. It is in the act of becoming one with the process.

In a world with shrinking attention spans, patience is a form of resistance. It is not passive resignation; it is active trust. To stay with a question before rushing to answer it. To keep showing up even when there's no applause. To water the seed even when there is no sign of green.

Patience: Silent Rhythm Of Fulfilment.

We live in an age where the world refreshes itself every few seconds. A click expects a result, a message expects a reply, and a thought expects an outcome—instantly. Patience, once revered as a virtue, now feels like an outdated app waiting to be deleted. Impatience wears the disguise of ambition. Quickness is applauded.

This collective restlessness is not trivial. It is reshaping how we think, work, and even feel. We have become experts at beginning things and amateurs at staying with them. The moment something takes longer than expected—a career, a relationship, a skill, a spiritual practice—our attention drifts. We scroll away from discomfort. We move on before something has had a chance to mature.

Etymologically, the word "patience" comes from the Latin "patientia", which means 'suffering' or 'enduring'. But its philosophical significance has always been closer to fulfilment than to suffering. Patience is not merely the ability to wait; it is the ability to inhabit the waiting fully. It is not about standing still while tapping your foot. It is about becoming quite enough to notice the unfolding of the moment itself.

When we act with impatience, our focus is consumed by the result. We perform the act like a courier delivering a package—hurriedly, impersonally, eager to be done. Patience, on the other hand, allows us to savor the process. A musician who practices slowly, a potter who waits for the clay to set, a gardener who tends to saplings through changing seasons—they all know that the real joy is not in the applause, the sale, or the bloom. It is in the act of becoming one with the process.

In a world with shrinking attention spans, patience is a form of resistance. It is not passive resignation; it is active trust. To stay with a question before rushing to answer it. To keep showing up even when there's no applause. To water the seed even when there is no sign of green.

Read the given passage and answer the five questions that follow.

I caught sight of her at the play, and, in answer to her beckoning, I went over during the interval and sat down beside her. It was long since I had last seen her and if someone had not mentioned her name I hardly think I would have recognised her. She addressed me brightly.

'Well, it's many years since we first met. How time does fly! We're none of us getting any younger. Do you remember the first time I saw you? You asked me to luncheon.'

Did I remember?

It was twenty years ago and I was living in Paris. I had a tiny apartment in the Latin quarter overlooking a cemetery and I was earning barely enough money to keep body and soul together. She had read a book of mine and had written to me about it. I answered, thanking her, and presently I received from her another letter saying that she was passing through Paris and would like to have a chat with me; but her time was limited and the only free moment she had was on the following Thursday and would I give her a little luncheon at Foyot's afterwards? Foyot's is a restaurant at which the French senators eat and it was so far beyond my means that I never even thought of going there. But I was flattered and I was too young to have learned to say no to a woman. Few men, I may add, learn this untill they are too old to make it of any consequence to a woman what they say. I had eighty francs to last me the rest of the month, and a modest luncheon should not cost more than fifteen. If I cut out coffee for the next two weeks I could manage well enough.

Read the given passage and answer the five questions that follow.

I caught sight of her at the play, and, in answer to her beckoning, I went over during the interval and sat down beside her. It was long since I had last seen her and if someone had not mentioned her name I hardly think I would have recognised her. She addressed me brightly.

'Well, it's many years since we first met. How time does fly! We're none of us getting any younger. Do you remember the first time I saw you? You asked me to luncheon.'

Did I remember?

It was twenty years ago and I was living in Paris. I had a tiny apartment in the Latin quarter overlooking a cemetery and I was earning barely enough money to keep body and soul together. She had read a book of mine and had written to me about it. I answered, thanking her, and presently I received from her another letter saying that she was passing through Paris and would like to have a chat with me; but her time was limited and the only free moment she had was on the following Thursday and would I give her a little luncheon at Foyot's afterwards? Foyot's is a restaurant at which the French senators eat and it was so far beyond my means that I never even thought of going there. But I was flattered and I was too young to have learned to say no to a woman. Few men, I may add, learn this untill they are too old to make it of any consequence to a woman what they say. I had eighty francs to last me the rest of the month, and a modest luncheon should not cost more than fifteen. If I cut out coffee for the next two weeks I could manage well enough.

Read the given passage and answer the five questions that follow.

I caught sight of her at the play, and, in answer to her beckoning, I went over during the interval and sat down beside her. It was long since I had last seen her and if someone had not mentioned her name I hardly think I would have recognised her. She addressed me brightly.

'Well, it's many years since we first met. How time does fly! We're none of us getting any younger. Do you remember the first time I saw you? You asked me to luncheon.'

Did I remember?

It was twenty years ago and I was living in Paris. I had a tiny apartment in the Latin quarter overlooking a cemetery and I was earning barely enough money to keep body and soul together. She had read a book of mine and had written to me about it. I answered, thanking her, and presently I received from her another letter saying that she was passing through Paris and would like to have a chat with me; but her time was limited and the only free moment she had was on the following Thursday and would I give her a little luncheon at Foyot's afterwards? Foyot's is a restaurant at which the French senators eat and it was so far beyond my means that I never even thought of going there. But I was flattered and I was too young to have learned to say no to a woman. Few men, I may add, learn this untill they are too old to make it of any consequence to a woman what they say. I had eighty francs to last me the rest of the month, and a modest luncheon should not cost more than fifteen. If I cut out coffee for the next two weeks I could manage well enough.

Read the given passage and answer the five questions that follow.

I caught sight of her at the play, and, in answer to her beckoning, I went over during the interval and sat down beside her. It was long since I had last seen her and if someone had not mentioned her name I hardly think I would have recognised her. She addressed me brightly.

'Well, it's many years since we first met. How time does fly! We're none of us getting any younger. Do you remember the first time I saw you? You asked me to luncheon.'

Did I remember?

It was twenty years ago and I was living in Paris. I had a tiny apartment in the Latin quarter overlooking a cemetery and I was earning barely enough money to keep body and soul together. She had read a book of mine and had written to me about it. I answered, thanking her, and presently I received from her another letter saying that she was passing through Paris and would like to have a chat with me; but her time was limited and the only free moment she had was on the following Thursday and would I give her a little luncheon at Foyot's afterwards? Foyot's is a restaurant at which the French senators eat and it was so far beyond my means that I never even thought of going there. But I was flattered and I was too young to have learned to say no to a woman. Few men, I may add, learn this untill they are too old to make it of any consequence to a woman what they say. I had eighty francs to last me the rest of the month, and a modest luncheon should not cost more than fifteen. If I cut out coffee for the next two weeks I could manage well enough.

Read the given passage and answer the five questions that follow.

I caught sight of her at the play, and, in answer to her beckoning, I went over during the interval and sat down beside her. It was long since I had last seen her and if someone had not mentioned her name I hardly think I would have recognised her. She addressed me brightly.

'Well, it's many years since we first met. How time does fly! We're none of us getting any younger. Do you remember the first time I saw you? You asked me to luncheon.'

Did I remember?

It was twenty years ago and I was living in Paris. I had a tiny apartment in the Latin quarter overlooking a cemetery and I was earning barely enough money to keep body and soul together. She had read a book of mine and had written to me about it. I answered, thanking her, and presently I received from her another letter saying that she was passing through Paris and would like to have a chat with me; but her time was limited and the only free moment she had was on the following Thursday and would I give her a little luncheon at Foyot's afterwards? Foyot's is a restaurant at which the French senators eat and it was so far beyond my means that I never even thought of going there. But I was flattered and I was too young to have learned to say no to a woman. Few men, I may add, learn this untill they are too old to make it of any consequence to a woman what they say. I had eighty francs to last me the rest of the month, and a modest luncheon should not cost more than fifteen. If I cut out coffee for the next two weeks I could manage well enough.

Roving has always been, and still is, my ruling passion, the joy of my heart, the very sunshine of my existence. In childhood, in boyhood, and in adulthood, I have been a rover; not a mere rambler among the woody glens and upon the hill-tops of my own native land, but an enthusiastic rover throughout the length and breadth of the wide, wide world.

It was a wild, black night of howling storm, the night on which I was born on the foaming bosom of the broad Atlantic Ocean. My father was a sea captain; my grandfather was a marine. Nobody could tell positively what occupation his father had followed; but my dear mother used to assert that he had been a midshipman, whose grandfather, on mother's side, had been an admiral in the Royal Navy. At any rate, we knew that, as far back as our family could be traced, it had been intimately connected with the great watery waste. Indeed, this was the case on both sides of the house; for my mother always went to sea with my father on his long voyages, and so spent the greater part of her life upon the water.

Thus, it was, I suppose, that I came to inherit a roving disposition. Soon after I was born, my father, being old, retired from a seafaring life, purchased a small cottage in a fishing village on the west coast of England, and settled down to spend the evening of his life on the shores of the sea which had for so many years been his home. It was not long after this that I began to show the roving spirit that dwelt within me.

Roving has always been, and still is, my ruling passion, the joy of my heart, the very sunshine of my existence. In childhood, in boyhood, and in adulthood, I have been a rover; not a mere rambler among the woody glens and upon the hill-tops of my own native land, but an enthusiastic rover throughout the length and breadth of the wide, wide world.

It was a wild, black night of howling storm, the night on which I was born on the foaming bosom of the broad Atlantic Ocean. My father was a sea captain; my grandfather was a marine. Nobody could tell positively what occupation his father had followed; but my dear mother used to assert that he had been a midshipman, whose grandfather, on mother's side, had been an admiral in the Royal Navy. At any rate, we knew that, as far back as our family could be traced, it had been intimately connected with the great watery waste. Indeed, this was the case on both sides of the house; for my mother always went to sea with my father on his long voyages, and so spent the greater part of her life upon the water.

Thus, it was, I suppose, that I came to inherit a roving disposition. Soon after I was born, my father, being old, retired from a seafaring life, purchased a small cottage in a fishing village on the west coast of England, and settled down to spend the evening of his life on the shores of the sea which had for so many years been his home. It was not long after this that I began to show the roving spirit that dwelt within me.

Roving has always been, and still is, my ruling passion, the joy of my heart, the very sunshine of my existence. In childhood, in boyhood, and in adulthood, I have been a rover; not a mere rambler among the woody glens and upon the hill-tops of my own native land, but an enthusiastic rover throughout the length and breadth of the wide, wide world.

It was a wild, black night of howling storm, the night on which I was born on the foaming bosom of the broad Atlantic Ocean. My father was a sea captain; my grandfather was a marine. Nobody could tell positively what occupation his father had followed; but my dear mother used to assert that he had been a midshipman, whose grandfather, on mother's side, had been an admiral in the Royal Navy. At any rate, we knew that, as far back as our family could be traced, it had been intimately connected with the great watery waste. Indeed, this was the case on both sides of the house; for my mother always went to sea with my father on his long voyages, and so spent the greater part of her life upon the water.

Thus, it was, I suppose, that I came to inherit a roving disposition. Soon after I was born, my father, being old, retired from a seafaring life, purchased a small cottage in a fishing village on the west coast of England, and settled down to spend the evening of his life on the shores of the sea which had for so many years been his home. It was not long after this that I began to show the roving spirit that dwelt within me.

Roving has always been, and still is, my ruling passion, the joy of my heart, the very sunshine of my existence. In childhood, in boyhood, and in adulthood, I have been a rover; not a mere rambler among the woody glens and upon the hill-tops of my own native land, but an enthusiastic rover throughout the length and breadth of the wide, wide world.

It was a wild, black night of howling storm, the night on which I was born on the foaming bosom of the broad Atlantic Ocean. My father was a sea captain; my grandfather was a marine. Nobody could tell positively what occupation his father had followed; but my dear mother used to assert that he had been a midshipman, whose grandfather, on mother's side, had been an admiral in the Royal Navy. At any rate, we knew that, as far back as our family could be traced, it had been intimately connected with the great watery waste. Indeed, this was the case on both sides of the house; for my mother always went to sea with my father on his long voyages, and so spent the greater part of her life upon the water.

Thus, it was, I suppose, that I came to inherit a roving disposition. Soon after I was born, my father, being old, retired from a seafaring life, purchased a small cottage in a fishing village on the west coast of England, and settled down to spend the evening of his life on the shores of the sea which had for so many years been his home. It was not long after this that I began to show the roving spirit that dwelt within me.

Roving has always been, and still is, my ruling passion, the joy of my heart, the very sunshine of my existence. In childhood, in boyhood, and in adulthood, I have been a rover; not a mere rambler among the woody glens and upon the hill-tops of my own native land, but an enthusiastic rover throughout the length and breadth of the wide, wide world.

It was a wild, black night of howling storm, the night on which I was born on the foaming bosom of the broad Atlantic Ocean. My father was a sea captain; my grandfather was a marine. Nobody could tell positively what occupation his father had followed; but my dear mother used to assert that he had been a midshipman, whose grandfather, on mother's side, had been an admiral in the Royal Navy. At any rate, we knew that, as far back as our family could be traced, it had been intimately connected with the great watery waste. Indeed, this was the case on both sides of the house; for my mother always went to sea with my father on his long voyages, and so spent the greater part of her life upon the water.

Thus, it was, I suppose, that I came to inherit a roving disposition. Soon after I was born, my father, being old, retired from a seafaring life, purchased a small cottage in a fishing village on the west coast of England, and settled down to spend the evening of his life on the shores of the sea which had for so many years been his home. It was not long after this that I began to show the roving spirit that dwelt within me.

Who among us has not enjoyed the transient pleasures of a little sugar? A bite of biscuit, a slice of cake, even the simple act of stirring sugar into a cup of something warm—all these constitute a deeply individual moment, a tiny space of solitude in the hectic race of humanity. Worldwide, people enjoy a sugar rush, which they hope ,will pass. The global consumption of sugar crossed 178 million metric tons in 2024—but, in fact, the impact of sugar and its sibling, chocolate, stays with us forever.

Sugar's planetary history is remarkable. From being a locally grown product, it has expanded to 65 million acres worldwide; a dozen countries use more than 25% of their arable land to grow it. Alongside cattle ranching, 80% of the Amazon rainforest has been cut down for growing sugarcane. Once planted, it takes 25 gallons of water to produce one pound of cane sugar—that's a mind-boggling 34 liters per teaspoon. Meanwhile, the global chocolate market has caused the deforestation of vast stretches worldwide; cocoa decimated 2.3 million hectares just between 2001 and 2015. These industries further emit greenhouse gases, warming air and releasing chemicals into land and water, harming ecology and species.

Alongside, sugar and chocolate have bitter social histories. Both stem from pasts of enslavement; their global boom shows colonialism gleaming in shiny wrappers of business. These transplanted entire families—in a bitter-sweet twist, the ancestors of V.S. Naipaul, the Indian-origin writer, were taken as indentured labour from Uttar Pradesh to Trinidad to grow sugar. Helpless child labourers still work in cocoa farms, spraying pesticides and carrying sacks of goodies. Ironically, commodities which harm earth and vulnerable communities ultimately catch up with everybody—many of the world's deadliest diseases, diabetes to cardiovascular illness, come from these.

Who among us has not enjoyed the transient pleasures of a little sugar? A bite of biscuit, a slice of cake, even the simple act of stirring sugar into a cup of something warm—all these constitute a deeply individual moment, a tiny space of solitude in the hectic race of humanity. Worldwide, people enjoy a sugar rush, which they hope ,will pass. The global consumption of sugar crossed 178 million metric tons in 2024—but, in fact, the impact of sugar and its sibling, chocolate, stays with us forever.

Sugar's planetary history is remarkable. From being a locally grown product, it has expanded to 65 million acres worldwide; a dozen countries use more than 25% of their arable land to grow it. Alongside cattle ranching, 80% of the Amazon rainforest has been cut down for growing sugarcane. Once planted, it takes 25 gallons of water to produce one pound of cane sugar—that's a mind-boggling 34 liters per teaspoon. Meanwhile, the global chocolate market has caused the deforestation of vast stretches worldwide; cocoa decimated 2.3 million hectares just between 2001 and 2015. These industries further emit greenhouse gases, warming air and releasing chemicals into land and water, harming ecology and species.

Alongside, sugar and chocolate have bitter social histories. Both stem from pasts of enslavement; their global boom shows colonialism gleaming in shiny wrappers of business. These transplanted entire families—in a bitter-sweet twist, the ancestors of V.S. Naipaul, the Indian-origin writer, were taken as indentured labour from Uttar Pradesh to Trinidad to grow sugar. Helpless child labourers still work in cocoa farms, spraying pesticides and carrying sacks of goodies. Ironically, commodities which harm earth and vulnerable communities ultimately catch up with everybody—many of the world's deadliest diseases, diabetes to cardiovascular illness, come from these.

Who among us has not enjoyed the transient pleasures of a little sugar? A bite of biscuit, a slice of cake, even the simple act of stirring sugar into a cup of something warm—all these constitute a deeply individual moment, a tiny space of solitude in the hectic race of humanity. Worldwide, people enjoy a sugar rush, which they hope ,will pass. The global consumption of sugar crossed 178 million metric tons in 2024—but, in fact, the impact of sugar and its sibling, chocolate, stays with us forever.

Sugar's planetary history is remarkable. From being a locally grown product, it has expanded to 65 million acres worldwide; a dozen countries use more than 25% of their arable land to grow it. Alongside cattle ranching, 80% of the Amazon rainforest has been cut down for growing sugarcane. Once planted, it takes 25 gallons of water to produce one pound of cane sugar—that's a mind-boggling 34 liters per teaspoon. Meanwhile, the global chocolate market has caused the deforestation of vast stretches worldwide; cocoa decimated 2.3 million hectares just between 2001 and 2015. These industries further emit greenhouse gases, warming air and releasing chemicals into land and water, harming ecology and species.

Alongside, sugar and chocolate have bitter social histories. Both stem from pasts of enslavement; their global boom shows colonialism gleaming in shiny wrappers of business. These transplanted entire families—in a bitter-sweet twist, the ancestors of V.S. Naipaul, the Indian-origin writer, were taken as indentured labour from Uttar Pradesh to Trinidad to grow sugar. Helpless child labourers still work in cocoa farms, spraying pesticides and carrying sacks of goodies. Ironically, commodities which harm earth and vulnerable communities ultimately catch up with everybody—many of the world's deadliest diseases, diabetes to cardiovascular illness, come from these.

Who among us has not enjoyed the transient pleasures of a little sugar? A bite of biscuit, a slice of cake, even the simple act of stirring sugar into a cup of something warm—all these constitute a deeply individual moment, a tiny space of solitude in the hectic race of humanity. Worldwide, people enjoy a sugar rush, which they hope ,will pass. The global consumption of sugar crossed 178 million metric tons in 2024—but, in fact, the impact of sugar and its sibling, chocolate, stays with us forever.

Sugar's planetary history is remarkable. From being a locally grown product, it has expanded to 65 million acres worldwide; a dozen countries use more than 25% of their arable land to grow it. Alongside cattle ranching, 80% of the Amazon rainforest has been cut down for growing sugarcane. Once planted, it takes 25 gallons of water to produce one pound of cane sugar—that's a mind-boggling 34 liters per teaspoon. Meanwhile, the global chocolate market has caused the deforestation of vast stretches worldwide; cocoa decimated 2.3 million hectares just between 2001 and 2015. These industries further emit greenhouse gases, warming air and releasing chemicals into land and water, harming ecology and species.

Alongside, sugar and chocolate have bitter social histories. Both stem from pasts of enslavement; their global boom shows colonialism gleaming in shiny wrappers of business. These transplanted entire families—in a bitter-sweet twist, the ancestors of V.S. Naipaul, the Indian-origin writer, were taken as indentured labour from Uttar Pradesh to Trinidad to grow sugar. Helpless child labourers still work in cocoa farms, spraying pesticides and carrying sacks of goodies. Ironically, commodities which harm earth and vulnerable communities ultimately catch up with everybody—many of the world's deadliest diseases, diabetes to cardiovascular illness, come from these.

Who among us has not enjoyed the transient pleasures of a little sugar? A bite of biscuit, a slice of cake, even the simple act of stirring sugar into a cup of something warm—all these constitute a deeply individual moment, a tiny space of solitude in the hectic race of humanity. Worldwide, people enjoy a sugar rush, which they hope ,will pass. The global consumption of sugar crossed 178 million metric tons in 2024—but, in fact, the impact of sugar and its sibling, chocolate, stays with us forever.

Sugar's planetary history is remarkable. From being a locally grown product, it has expanded to 65 million acres worldwide; a dozen countries use more than 25% of their arable land to grow it. Alongside cattle ranching, 80% of the Amazon rainforest has been cut down for growing sugarcane. Once planted, it takes 25 gallons of water to produce one pound of cane sugar—that's a mind-boggling 34 liters per teaspoon. Meanwhile, the global chocolate market has caused the deforestation of vast stretches worldwide; cocoa decimated 2.3 million hectares just between 2001 and 2015. These industries further emit greenhouse gases, warming air and releasing chemicals into land and water, harming ecology and species.

Alongside, sugar and chocolate have bitter social histories. Both stem from pasts of enslavement; their global boom shows colonialism gleaming in shiny wrappers of business. These transplanted entire families—in a bitter-sweet twist, the ancestors of V.S. Naipaul, the Indian-origin writer, were taken as indentured labour from Uttar Pradesh to Trinidad to grow sugar. Helpless child labourers still work in cocoa farms, spraying pesticides and carrying sacks of goodies. Ironically, commodities which harm earth and vulnerable communities ultimately catch up with everybody—many of the world's deadliest diseases, diabetes to cardiovascular illness, come from these.